Pentagon Review Finds Guantanamo Conditions Meet Geneva Conventions, but Urges More Interaction for Some Detainees - washingtonpost.com
Gitmo treatment found legal
washingtonpost.com
What - no electric shocks? No waterboarding? What kind of an American military prison is this, anyway? At least one "human rights group" is not pleased:
Civil liberties groups, including the Center for Constitutional Rights, which is about to issue a report on conditions at the prison, challenged Walsh's findings.
"We do think conditions are in violation of U.S. obligations to treat prisoners humanely, and prisoners are at a physical and mental breaking point," said Pardiss Kebriaei, a staff lawyer at the center. "These are not the conclusions we had hoped for under Obama. It's very disappointing."
Let me get this straight. They find the fact that a report found the prisoners were treated humanely "disappointing?" What in the name of all that is good and holy is wrong with these people?
It's simple, really. They have been bellyaching for 8 years that the prisoners were being mistreated and now that a report shows they were wrong, they aren't big enough to admit it.
Then there are the inmate lawyers who really should be given some kind of award for doublespeak. This one is complaining about the force feeding of his client:
Ahmed Zaid Salem Zuhair, a Saudi who has been on a hunger strike since the summer of 2005, has lost so much weight during his time at Guantanamo Bay that a federal judge has ordered an independent medical evaluation of him. Zuhair's attorney, Ramzi Kassem, said his client has been strapped to an uncomfortable chair for hours at a time during feedings and described the procedure as very painful.
"They deliberately use this brutal method that has no medical justification to put pressure on people like my client to give up the hunger strike," he said.
What universe does this guy live in where there is "no medical justification" for trying to keep someone alive?